Banksy and Baldadash

There were a couple of interesting items in today’s Torygraph. The first was about how a $50 non-descript landscape in a New York charity shop was turned into a piece worth over $200,000 due to the addition of a Nazi officer sitting on a bench looking at the scene. The extra detail was added by Banksy. Does this increase the value of the painting or just increase its price? An interesting addition to the discussion about art and money.

Banksy touched up oil painting he bought for $50, by adding Nazi officer sitting on a bench, and it will now fetch thousands at auction

The other article was about ” a new guide to help decode the “meaningless” terms used [in the art world] by the establishment to help “heighten its mystique”, revealing the real, amusing and insulting definitions hidden underneath.” This guide has been written by Peter Hook, a director at Sotherby’s. I’ve already blogged about International Art English, aka Arty Bollocks. Hook made some interesting observations:

“Describing a painting as “honest” could be heard as calling it “inept”, he added, while “important” signifies a work that is “art-historically significant but difficult to sell”. He added the term “interesting” could be considered an ““all-purpose word to disguise the observer’s inability to fathom the point of a painting”, while “ahead of the market” denotes something is overpriced.

“Hook told the Telegraph the terms were often used to “camouflage the nakedly commercial aspect” of selling art. “You don’t say selling and buying; you say sourced and placed,” he said. “Dealers prefer to be curators. Galleries become spaces.””


About notes to the milkman

I'm a printmaker based in the North West of England, living in Bolton and printing at Hot Bed Press in Salford. Please visit my website
This entry was posted in Art, Artists, Landscapes and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Banksy and Baldadash

  1. anne54 says:

    It’s a painting that has gone from an opshop special to one that ticks a quite a few of the right boxes — famous artist (Banksy), outrageous subject (Nazi), interesting story and generosity. It certainly makes for a more thought provoking work. But worth that much?

  2. Like much of his other work, that’s an “interesting” Banksy.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s