A Gold Medal For Bronze

Wouldn’t life be boring if we all liked the same thing? Before going down to see the Bronze exhibition at the Royal Academy last week, the Management and I watched the Culture Show episode which included a look at the exhibition. Andrew Graham-Dixon was accompanied by Gallery owner Danny Katz, who has been buying and selling sculpture for over forty years.

In front of ‘Putto with Tambourine’ (1429) by Donatello, Katz was in ecstasy. “This is the one object I totally covet.” “You want to take it home?” asked Graham-Dixon. “I couldn’t! I’m only a mere man, a mortal. I couldn’t live with something like this. This is great art.”

My reaction? It was okay but it didn’t really do much for me. In the case next to it, though, were two superb works. They were clearly modern. I recognised them immediately as probably by Picasso and by Giacometti. However checking the labels showed I was a little out! The ‘Picasso’ was in fact a sculpture of a Capotribu, or tribal chief, from Sardinia (Nuragic period) dating from 8th -4th century BCE (that’s just BC in old money).

The ‘Giacometti’ was a little more recent – 2nd century BCE. It was an Etruscan Votive Figure ‘Evening Shadow’. Evidently it had inspired Giacometti to produce his ‘stick men’.

The one piece actually by Giacometti was The Cage from 1950.

Some of the sculptures that actually were modern I really liked. I’d seen many in books but it’s always better to see the real thing. These included Umberto Boccioni’s Unique Forms of Continuity in Space from 1913, Constantin Brancusi’s Danaide c.1918 and Spider IV 1996 by Louise Bourgeois, which hung precariously on the wall above a bench – I didn’t risk sitting under it!

Umberto Boccioni’s Unique Forms of Continuity in Space

One piece I found amusing was Painted Bronze (Ale Cans) by Jasper Johns (1960). It was said to have been made in response to a remark purportedly made by Willem de Kooning about gallery owner Leo Castelli’s ability to sell anything – even beer cans.

I was initially puzzled by a couple of pieces of very ordinary subjects, one of a pug and one of a turkey. Fortunately, the information on the wall solved the puzzle. “Creatures such as the turkey and the pug, ubiquitous today, were prized as exotic imports when the bronze likenesses were created. [1600/10 for the Pug by Hubert Gerhard and c. 1567 -70 for the Turkey by Giambologna.]”

The final pieces I want to mention are four by Matisse. ‘Back I’ was created in 1908-09 and is a well modelled male torso from the rear. ‘Back II’ from 1913 was also well modelled but the surface looked as if it had been cut with an axe and carving tools. It may have been female. ‘Back III’ (1916) is probably female as it has a long plait. The shaping and finish is much cruder. Finally ‘Back IV’ dating from c. 1931 is much smoother than III but the lines are much simpler, and not particularly realistic. The buttocks are not much more than minor curves and the legs are like cylindrical tree trunks. The four sculptures were side by side and it was fascinating to be able to compare their similarities and differences.

In some respects it was an unusual exhibition. Most exhibitions are about a single artist, or group of artists, or about a particular period, and are intended to be “educational” in the loosest sense of the word. By having the theme of a material, this exhibition covered work from all over the world (I haven’t mentioned the fascinating pieces from Nigeria and India) and a time period of nearly three thousand years. As it was shown by themes – portraits, groups, animals, religion and so on – it was possible to compare different periods and cultures, but basically the pieces were selected for their intrinsic value as works of art and, as such, it was an exhibition simply to be enjoyed.


About notes to the milkman

I'm a printmaker based in the North West of England, living in Bolton and printing at Hot Bed Press in Salford. Please visit my website johnpindararts.weebly.com
This entry was posted in Art, Art Gallery, Artists, exhibition, Sculpture and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to A Gold Medal For Bronze

  1. seascapesaus says:

    I enjoyed your review John. Especially liked the whizz through time and the re-connection to Boccioni’s work. A contemporary sculptor would probably not choose bronze to express the complexity of human movement, but Boccioni did it better than well.

  2. ms6282 says:

    Hi John

    A good review. This is an exhibition I’d like to see – and your enthusiasm certainly reinforces that – but I doubt I’ll be able to get down to London before it closes. I agree with your comments re the Donatello. The other pieces shown in your review are much more interesting and show a lot more imagination and inspiration, I think. But hen not everyone has the same tastes – if we did the world would be a much less interesting place.

  3. It will be a shame if you don’t get the chance to check it out. It was the Management’s favourite exhibition – and we’ve been to a fair few in our time.

  4. Lovely photos. Seeing the Boccioni would be great, and it already looks particularly good in this photo.

  5. Pingback: From Saensbury Wing to Sainsbury Wing | notes to the milkman

  6. clinock says:

    Thanks for the review and pics – the more ancient sculptures send shivers up my spine. I once met Henry Moore when I was working as ground crew for BOAC when it existed. A lovely British gentleman and what struck me was how small and delicate he was compared to the sculptures he created…

    • Thank you for your comments. I’m envious of your meeting Moore. I once met Jimmy Saville! (Perhaps not something to boast about nowadays!) Regarding your comment on a previous post, do you not get notifications of replies on your dashboard? I get emails about comments on my own posts but need to use the dashboard for replies to comments I have made on other people’s posts.

      • clinock says:

        Ah, a senior moment John – can’t quite recall what my problem was. I think I thought I wasn’t getting email notifications of your posts but then found that they were most often buried amongst those bundled notifications I get (multiple posts in one mailing) and often I don’t make it through all the way and then they disappear – am I making sense?

  7. Pingback: Richard Dorment’s Year of Art | notes to the milkman

  8. Pingback: Future Heirlooms- Sally Hewitt

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s